Skip to main content

How I screwed up by not having an epilogue

I've been reading a few books where I have been a tad annoyed at epilogues which are often a bit of a waste of space - a nice way to fit an extra thousand words into a novel and nothing more, really. So when I was editing Falling for Jack, I decided I wouldn't do an epilogue. I hadn't done one for the previous book and as a reader I'd gone off them as being quite unnecessary so I figured I wouldn't inflict that torture on anyone who was doing me a favour by forking out their money for the book. Well. Big mistake. Big, big mistake. Once the reviews starting coming in for Falling for Jack, there was one thing that really made me sit up and start thinking. A lot of people (not just one or two) were commenting that the book felt unfinished. That they wanted to know what happened after. It's not giving anything away to say that the couple in the story, Jack and Robyn, do get together! But I had made the mistake of having a plot line that did leave some things open enough that at the end of the book you were left thinking "But..." What happens? How does it go? Does Robyn's business get off the ground? An interesting faux pax on my part since I don't like books or movies that are left up in the air or leave it open to your own interpretation. You want to know that it's all going to be okay. I think of the movie Lost in Translation where at the end there is massive depth of feeling between Charlotte and Bob (who are both married, yikes) and while they don't necessarily get together (it would never have worked!) it does have closure to it and its happy closure. I think they accept their time together for what it was, they will probably still love each other til they die, and will go on with their lives, but it isn't unhappy or left in the air. You don't know what he whispers to her at the end, but they both got this one last moment. Especially since it was looking like they weren't going to. Sigh. (Which may lead to another blog post some time on the reverse sex difference - 55 year old woman and 25 year old man. Do we like that? Hmmmm...) So with the Jack and Robyn story, there were a couple of elements that did need a decent ending. You wanted to know how Robyn's gig at the trade show went, since her fledgling fashion biz was a pretty important factor in her life. And there were a couple of secondary characters, Sage and Ethan, who kind of got together - but did it last? I could have had one of those scenes a year later where Robyn is glowingly pregnant and Jack is absolutely besotted over her and his unborn baby (or maybe not cos, I mean, you know they are going to get married and have lots of kids). But something to tie everything up nicely there. So, I certainly got a nice smack over the hand on that one and have begun to see epilogues in a different light and in fact have added one in Blue Creek Bachelor as a result. I'm wary of prologues and flashbacks, too, cos as writers we kind of want to put everything in there cos they're the fun bits to write but they can be just wasted words or end up hitting the reader over the head too much. But there has to be some discernment on them and with Jack and Robyn, my discerning was a little whack.
But just in case you have read the book, and if you haven't, there are no real spoilers here, this is what happens.... Robyn's designs are a hit at the trade show and the business takes off without Jack-the-millionaire's help, but then she is with child, so Sage takes over more of the business, along with Harriet, so Robyn can be more of a hands-on mum and just focus on designing. And yes, Sage and Ethan stay together, not without plenty of rocky moments (maybe I should write their story). As to whether they have children... that, I don't even want to think about!

Comments

Unknown said…
I like epilogues. And prologues too. I have nothing against them, unless they're too long.
Joanne said…
Kind of like exclamation marks.... nice in moderation....!!

Popular posts from this blog

Wet weather

It is starting to get cooler, praise be. There was a heap of rain one day this week, and by the time I got to work I was damp, to put it mildly. Soaked is overstating it but uncomfortably wet. Have you ever tried to dry off your trousers with a hair dryer?  I would have been there forever! If only, I thought, I had a spare anything at work, like a skirt even, but no. Nothing to change into. There was only a pair of pantyhose in case I ripped them, although I had stuffed spare socks and boots in my bag so I could have dry feet at work. It is worth noting that the very next day I went to work, I had completely forgotten that thought about spare clothes altogether and did not take spare anything for future weather events. In fact, I only remembered as I was thinking about writing this blog post. Hopeless. Given I’m trying to keep up my walking part-way to work to get in a good 40 minutes/steps, I should take along spare clothes to keep in my locker just in case. It really was uncom...

My latest obsession

 I have recently been a bit obsessed with the practice of junk journalling. Junk jouraling! I love it so far. Its been around a few years and seems to have taken over a bit from from the scrapbooking of yore, but the thing I like about it is you use up all your stuff that is lying around. You can use all your rubbishy bits and pieces of paper and things. I like the tutorials of a lady called Leah with a channel called Thrifty Day , and I've had a go at it and I kind of really like doing it. Sometimes I feel a bit out of sorts (I blame hormones... or perhaps it is, rather, the lack of them!) and so I decide to cut stuff up and stick it on a page and I feel better. Therapeutic! I also think that because it is play and there are no rules and you can be as messy as you like, and start again if the page looks like utter rubbish, well, it is just so good for you. It's like being a kid and let's face it... we got to do all the cool stuff when we were kids. Why not , now we're ...

An old post

This is a blog I wrote for a now defunct pop culture site I used to contribute to, some years ago.   A friend was reading some fiction I’d written the other day and after telling me what she did like about it, commented, “But you’re no Jane Austen.”   The only Jane Austen I have read is “ Emma .” and it was read under duress at university. I consider myself a person of not massively low intelligence, but it took three reads to get my head around it. Interestingly, that paper was not only my first and only complete Jane Austen experience, but my first and only experience of analysing English literature. I did get an A but not without suffering a degree of depression as a result. Yes, I gained an appreciation for some things (Elizabeth Barrett Browning sonnets, oh my gosh!) but analysing Emily Dickinson was enough to sap the will to live right out of me. Fortuitously, at the end of that semester, I saw the movie Stargate on TV,  and promptly un-enrolled myself fr...